President Obama recently said it was time to end the policy preventing gays from serving openly in the military. So the debate has started all over again but the reasonable arguments seem to be about the same.
This argument goes that there is nothing about being homosexual that makes men and women less competent in battle. But individual ability is less important that unit cohesion when it comes to combat effectiveness and staying safe. So, by refusing to remain closeted, gays are risking unit cohesion. This is because straight service men and women can’t bond and fight alongside homosexuals.
So, the current policy excludes a subset of soldiers because the brass feel the mainstream soldier is a homophobe. Effectively punishing gays because other men and women can’t hack them being gay. Don’t punish gays for the failings of others. Muster out those whose irrational hatreds and fears render them incapable of waging effective war alongside their fellow patriots.
-also-
Here is the only good reason I have heard for keeping the policy.
5 comments:
i get so curious when comments are mysteriously deleted. sneaky!
i was listening to some debate on the subject on NPR a couple weeks ago. I was so completely embarrassed by the argument to continue the policy, I think I turned it off.
Mer.
and i thought we had an understanding regarding pictures of your babe in the posts.
uh, oh. is that comment going to get mysteriously deleted by the administration?
Hah, no, we deleted my comment cause I was angry half way through and commented without reading the rest, and pretty much restated what the last paragraph said :)
I have resisted, but really....most of the butt kissing (read: ass kissing) that goes on in the military is done not by homosexuals, but by Generals and General-wanna-bes. I will not mention his name, (his initials are John McCain) but one wanna be even ran for President so that he could receive more of the same. Good thing I am writing this while I am not mad.
Post a Comment